Web Analytics

HIPAA Finally Shows Its Teeth

by Michael A. Davis on May 29, 2009

When was passed and made federal law by the Clinton administration in 1996, the fear of fines and even jail time sent the scrambling to beef up their security by the 2003 deadline.  However, for years afterwards, HIPAA remained a toothless tiger.  Occasionally, it growled and violators were threatened to clean up their act.  But it usually did not bite, as were rare and usually mild.

Since no serious prosecutions have taken place since HIPAA went into effect in 2003, I and the medical industry have wondered if HIPAA is just a made-up boogeyman meant to frighten them into compliance. 

All this changed on February 18 when the of Health and Human Services and the Federal Trade Commission issued a press release stating CVS had to pay $2.25 million to the U.S. government for .

The Office for Civil Rights () and the Federal Trade Commission caught the pharmacy chain red-handed disposing of empty pill bottles that contained patient data into dumpsters and trash containers outside select stores.  Among other issues, CVS “failed to implement adequate policies and procedures to appropriately safeguard patient information during the disposal process; and failed to adequately train employees on how to dispose of such information properly.”

CVS Corp., the parent company of the 6,000 store pharmacy chain, must implement a robust corrective action plan that requires Rule compliant policies and procedures for safeguarding patient information in addition to its .  CVS must also submit to a biennial audit by a third party to show their compliance.

Is HHS trying to set an example with the steep penalty?  Is CVS the sacrificial lamb intended to inspire other delinquent HIPAA violators to clean up their act? 

While many medical industry companies may have gambling with HIPAA violations, at least CVS learned it isn’t worth the .  Besides the possible penalties, compromising personal patient data is a strike against the reputation of a company.  And this can be more costly than any fine by the HHS.

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

Previous post:

Next post: